The story of Ramza Beoulve is presented to you as a historical accord – an account of a tale recorded by one historian and told to you by another. It’s subjective, an interpretation of loose facts collected by an archivist with a notable bias: to celebrate the achievements of your protagonist, a man whose influences and inspirations have been concealed by the church. As such, different readings of this story can proffer different results. Historical records are spotty at best, and even when written by the victor, choose to omit often-important facts.
